Achieving an integrated
approach to Asset Performance Management
Maximize edge-to-enterprise asset performance
System 1 APM seamlessly integrates asset strategy and health data to provide a unified and comprehensive perspective of your industrial operations. Leveraging advanced analytics and connected data sets, System 1 APM drives intelligent work management based on quantifiable risk to inform decisions that maximize edge-to-enterprise performance.
Asset Health Management (AHM)
The index measures maturity across four key functional aspects of APM, including asset health management, asset strategy management, asset defect elimination, and work management. Where organizations sit on the APM maturity curve, depends on the maturity of each function and how closely they integrate with one another.
Work Management (WM)
Inconsistent approach to monitoring, including differences in which assets are monitored and how
Asset Health Management function is siloed with no connection to work management, allowing assets to be monitored to failure
Asset Health Management predominately based on vibration monitoring
•
•
•
Organizations are typically challenged with
Pathway to Optimization
We would be pleased to help you identify your position on the APM maturity curve and the steps to move closer toward best-in-class
Start the Conversation
Copyright 2024 Baker Hughes Company
An integrated approach to APM
Pathway to Optimization
Contact
Consistent approach to monitoring across the enterprise
Consistent and sound prioritization of alarms and alerts
Well-defined process for execution of corrective actions, including connection to work management system
•
•
•
What to focus on
for improvement
Asset condition monitoring applied where cost-effective
and updated as new/low cost technology available
Robust and quantified process
for prioritization and execution of work following alarms and alerts
Process for continuous improvement, including refinement of alarm set points and asset models
•
•
•
Best in class
looks like
Routine maintenance consistently structured and complete with content such as required materials
Key corrective actions or tasks loaded into CMMS system
Process driven approach to managing master data
Process for continuous improvement of work instruction content and maintenance execution
•
•
•
•
Best in class
looks like
Enterprise-wide master data structure guidelines in place
Routine maintenance plans include work instructions + materials
Practical feedback loop to support continuous improvement of execution
Consistent and practical failure coding structure for asset types along with process to capture
and record information from
the field
•
•
•
•
What to focus on for improvement
Master data missing from
work management system, including assets and routine maintenance plans
Inconsistent master data structures due to a lack or
failure to follow guidelines
Inconsistent recording of work completed, limiting continuous improvement
•
•
•
Organizations are typically challenged with
Process for continuous improvement and alignment
of maintenance plans to operational context
Consistent plans for like assets
to support benchmarking and continuous improvement
Consistent approach to generating maintenance plan master data
•
•
•
Best in class
looks like
Recognition that reliability master data is foundational to generating and improving maintenance plan master data
Best-in-class templates or generic content used and varied to support each asset strategy
Repeatable process to evolve work management, based on deep connection between reliability decision making and work execution
•
•
•
What to focus on
for improvement
Inconsistent maintenance plans for like assets, making it difficult to benchmark and improve
Approach to strategy review is subjective and based on asset criticality, leading to different approaches to maintenance plan review and subjective decision-making
Strategy and maintenance plans reviewed, but not added to CMMS
•
•
•
Organizations are typically challenged with
Triggers for scalable analysis
to address problems of
different sizes
Robust process to log problems and trigger defect analysis based on prioritization of severity
and impact
Effective mechanism to ensure solutions are deployed where appropriate (e.g. to all like assets)
•
•
•
Best in class
looks like
Application of a consistent methodology for all problem solving
Consistent prioritization and response to triggers (e.g. agreement on when to assign
a team for problem solving)
Workflow and technical application that supports the deployment of learnings or solutions across the asset base
•
•
•
What to focus on for improvement
Focus on problems dissipate once analysis is complete, meaning some solutions are never applied
Different techniques applied to solve problems of different severity, irrespective of problem complexity
Inability to recognize or effectively act on the opportunity to apply solutions across the asset base
•
•
•
Organizations are typically challenged with
Asset Defect Elimination (ADE)
Asset Strategy Management (ASM)
APM Functional Maturity
APM Functional Integration
Developing
Functional Expertise
Best-in-Class
Strong Foundation
Organizations may be striving for effective execution of
work and predictable performance but are held back by inconsistent processes and functional silos.
Integration and maturity of each function would put organizations on the path to continuous improvement.
Organizations may have consistent and robust processes
to drive effective prioritization and execution of work.
However, integration of each function and respective systems would facilitate continuous improvement.
Organizations have consistent , robust, and integrated processes and systems to drive continuous improvement and achieve optimal asset performance while mitigating
risk and unplanned costs.
Organizations have established a strong foundation for Integrated APM with connection between processes like
asset condition monitoring and work execution.
To achieve maturity, organizations should focus on establishing robust and consistent processes.
Explore the APM Maturity Index