New Towns
Foundations, Futures & Finances
From the 1950s to the 1970s, successive governments oversaw the construction of more than 30 new towns across the UK. The focus then shifted towards regeneration and smaller urban extensions, and more recent smaller-scale initiates to create new settlements have not gained traction.
In this new research report, we examine how the government’s ambition to build these new settlements could be realised in both planning and financial terms, while also considering where these settlements could and should be delivered.
The full report, along with our conclusions, will integrate all elements: the foundations, future, and finances, of new towns.
Jump straight to a section:
A housing crisis
What's different now
Defining success
Get in touch
A housing crisis
Download the full report
Get in touch
Defining success
What's different now?
07881 002644
Chris Hemmings
Partner
Email
07775 562081
Leslie Schroeder
Head of Residential Research
Email
07917 233498
Sophie Davidson
Associate, Research
Email
In the next phase of research, we analyse where might be the best locations for a new town in England, and how we can create the right strategic framework for them to succeed.
Can new towns be delivered within the current planning framework and what powers or frameworks, might enable better, faster and cheaper delivery?
Download the full report
Download the full report
Download the full report
New towns can serve as models for sustainable urban development, contributing significantly to the UK's overall environmental goals.
Several factors that facilitated the delivery of new settlements are not transferable to the government’s proposed new towns programme.
It seems unlikely that public finances will be readily available in the same way that they were used to fund the development corporations. Instead, today’s environment is characterised by constrained public finances and a heavy reliance on private investment. Government borrowing is already significant, limiting the potential for large-scale public funding for new housing projects and accompanying infrastructure.
Spatial planning
Urgent need for housing
Increased demand coincides with a slowing in the growth of new build construction.
Availability of public finance
The spatial planning landscape has evolved significantly since the post-war new towns era, and further change is on the horizon. During the 1950/60s the focus was on national reconstruction. Under the 1946 New Towns Act, areas designated as new towns were able to see rapid development, through the establishment of development corporations which had significant powers over land acquisition and planning.
The post-war housing crisis in the UK was deemed a national emergency. The sense of urgency to rebuild fuelled a national consensus for government intervention. While the catalyst is different today, we now face a housing crisis driven by a complex interplay of factors: insufficient housebuilding (for a number of reasons, including: changing government policies, economic factors, and planning system issues), affordability issues, and a growing population. Like the post-war era, there is an increasing recognition of the need for government intervention, though the form it takes is debated.
This is largely due to changes to government policies and local government structures, the evolution of funding and investment mechanisms, and a more challenging planning environment (including land assembly difficulties and planning regulations).
Key
Currently supportive
Potentially supportive
No longer applicable or hinders progress
New build units built per annum (England)
(Source: MHCLG)
Early 1900s
Post-War era
2000s
2015 - 2024
Beyond 2025
The New Towns movement
1946: New Towns Act passed – enabling government-led new town development in response to post-war housing shortages
1960s - 1980s: Major new towns like Milton Keynes, Stevenage, Crawley, and Bracknell are developed, with government funding and Development Corporations playing
Attempts at sustainable settlements
Mid-2000s: Labour introduces the eco-towns initiative, aimed at sustainable development
2010: Most eco-town plans scrapped after a change in government and local opposition
2010: Regional Spatial Strategies abolished, marking a shift toward localism in planning
Policy evolves amid growing crisis
2015: Conservative government launches Garden Towns and Villages programme
2017: Policies refocus on ‘sustainable communities’ under “Garden Towns”
September 2024: New Towns Taskforce formed by Labour to oversee a new era of planned towns
November 2024: First call for evidence by Taskforce; local authorities invited to propose sites
December 2024: Labour publishes devolution white paper proposing Strategic Authorities and expanded mayoral powers
What's next
February 2025: Labour government provides update on the new towns programme
Summer 2025: New Towns Taskforce to deliver recommendations to ministers
Late 2020s - 2030s: If supported, first new towns under this scheme may begin development, likely in phased rollouts over several decades
2030s - 2040s: If supported, first new towns under this scheme may begin development, likely in phased rollouts over several decades
Foundations
1903:
Letchworth Garden City, the first in the garden city movement, is founded
1920:
Welwyn Garden City established, furthering the concept of planned, green, and self-contained communities
Early 1900s
Post-War era
2000s
2015 - 2024
Beyond 2025
Download the full report
Download the full report
Download the full report
Part A: The scale of the challenge
In the final phase of our research we examine the challenges in financing the necessary infrastructure. New towns are characterised by significant upfront and then phased infrastructure costs. However, this does not fit the standard housebuilder model.
Against a background of constrained public sector funding, we focus on the challenges of financing the infrastructure over timelines of potentially 30 years or more, and the part that both the private and public sectors can play.
Next phase
Download the full report
Download the full report
Part B
Part C
Download the full report
Download the full report
