LOCAL
AUTHORITies
Roads:
GVA
2009-2018
GVA
2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL
planning
Application
DENSITY
Green
BeLts
Roads:
RAIL:
RAIL:
TOWNS:
TOWNS:
THE
ARC
C
CAMBRIDGE
OXFORD
LONDON
PETERBOROUGH
CHELMSFORD
BIRMINGHAM
ELY
ST ALBANS
LEICESTER
COVENTRY
planning
Applications
by units
planning
Applications
by units
THE
ARC
C
1
2
3
4
5
7
6
14
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1. Peterborough
2. Fenland
3. East Cambridgeshire
4. East Northamptonshire
5. Huntingdonshire
6. Cambridge
7. South Cambridgeshire
8. Corby
9. Kettering
10. Wellingborough
11. Bedford
12. Daventry
13. Northampton
14. Milton Keynes
15. Central Bedfordshire
16. Luton
17. South Northamptonshire
18. Cherwell
19. Aylesbury Vale*
20. Chiltern*
21. West Oxfordshire
22. Oxford
23. Wycombe*
24. South Bucks*
25. Vale of White Horse
26. South Oxfordshire
GVA Growth
2009-2018
39.9 - 51.2
3.8 - 7.4
7.5 - 19.2
19.3 - 25.5
25.6 - 31.9
32.0 - 39.8
GVA Growth
2019-2028
15.1 - 22.8
13.6 - 15.0
11.8 - 13.5
10.1 - 11.7
7.7 - 10.0
6.5 - 7.6
Residential Planning Application Density
Low
High
Planning Applications
by number of units
150+
< 75
< 100
< 125
< 150
*Authorities 19, 20, 23 and 24 are now combined to be Buckinghamshire Unitary Authority.
Refloating the Arc is a detailed report on the proposed Oxford-Cambridge Arc corridor produced by our research specialists, in collaboration with our regional property professionals.
Refloating
Refloating the Arc interactive map
The below interactive map highlights important data on the Oxford-Cambridge corridor, collected by our research professionals. To understand how this data impacts the current concept of the Arc, read our full research report.
+ Introduction
- Introduction
Within the report introduction we summarise the history of the Arc and provide context for the sections that follow.
+ Section 2:
Priorities for the Arc
- Section 2:
Priorities for the Arc
Within the second section of the report, we consider the priorities for the Arc. We look at the broader context of the current climate and analyse which core factors will impact the Arc, either positively or negatively. Is the Arc deliverable, or is it likely to remain just a concept?
+ Section 1: Concept & progress
- Section 1:
concept & progress
Within the first section of the report, we consider the concept of the Arc, which has been under discussion for nearly 20 years, and look at the progress that has been made within that time.
- Section 4: Maximising existing corridors
Within the fourth section of the report, we address that there may be greater utilisation of development along already existing corridors, highlighting those that would not require considerable new infrastructure and could most benefit the region.
+ Section 3: Where could growth be delivered?
We address where growth could be delivered and consider which type of locations should be prioritised. We also analyse the strengths, weaknesses, potential and constraints for each.
- Summary & conclusions
Within the final section of the report, we summarise the core points we have made throughout the research and present the key themes which we believe should be actioned over the coming months and years to best service the region.
- Section 3: Where could growth be delivered?
+ Section 4: Maximising existing corridors
+ Summary & conclusions
Form to be embeded here once code is received
Contact us
For further information on the Oxford-Cambridge Arc, or to discuss current opportunities within the region, please contact one of our professionals:
EMAIL SCOTT
07860 360821
Scott Harkness
HEAD OF COMMERCIAL
EMAIL DANIEL
07801 666137
Daniel Francis
HEAD OF ReseaRCH
EMAIL COLIN
07771 924426
Colin Brown
HEAD OF PLANNING
& DEVELOPMENT
ReGISTER TO RECEIVE further research
EMAIL DANIEL
07771 924426
Colin Brown
HEAD OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
EMAIL COLIN
07860 360821
Scott Harkness
HEAD OF COMMERCIAL
1. Peterborough
2. Fenland
3. East Cambridgeshire
4. East Northamptonshire
5. Huntingdonshire
6. Cambridge
7. South Cambridgeshire
8. Corby
9. Kettering
10. Wellingborough
11. Bedford
12. Daventry
13. Northampton
14. Milton Keynes
15. Central Bedfordshire
16. Luton
17. South Northamptonshire
18. Cherwell
19. Aylesbury Vale*
20. Chiltern*
21. West Oxfordshire
22. Oxford
23. Wycombe*
24. South Bucks*
25. Vale of White Horse
26. South Oxfordshire
*Authorities 19, 20, 23 and 24 are now combined to be Buckinghamshire Unitary Authority.
1
2
3
5
7
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
13
12
11
10
9
8
6
4
Residential Planning Application Density
Low
High
GVA Growth
2009-2018
39.9 - 51.2
32.0 - 39.8
25.6 - 31.9
19.3 - 25.5
7.5 - 19.2
3.8 - 7.4
GVA Growth
2019-2028
15.1 - 22.8
13.6 - 15.0
11.8 - 13.5
10.1 - 11.7
7.7 - 10.0
6.5 - 7.6
Planning Applications
by number of units
< 103000
< 150
< 125
< 100
< 75
See next
CAMBRIDGE
BIRMINGHAM
OXFORD
LONDON
PETERBOROUGH
ELY
ST ALBANS
LEICESTER
COVENTRY
CHELMSFORD
See previous
1. Peterborough
2. Fenland
3. East Cambridgeshire
4. East Northamptonshire
5. Huntingdonshire
6. Cambridge
7. South Cambridgeshire
8. Corby
9. Kettering
*Authorities 19, 20, 23 and 24 are now combined to be Buckinghamshire Unitary Authority.
10. Wellingborough
11. Bedford
12. Daventry
13. Northampton
14. Milton Keynes
15. Central Bedfordshire
16. Luton
17. South Northamptonshire
18. Cherwell
19. Aylesbury Vale*
20. Chiltern*
21. West Oxfordshire
22. Oxford
23. Wycombe*
24. South Bucks*
25. Vale of White Horse
26. South Oxfordshire
GVA Growth
2009-2018
39.9 - 51.2
32.0 - 39.8
25.6 - 31.9
19.3 - 25.5
7.5 - 19.2
3.8 - 7.4
GVA Growth
2019-2028
15.1 - 22.8
13.6 - 15.0
11.8 - 13.5
10.1 - 11.7
6.5 - 7.6
6.5 - 7.6
Residential Planning Application Density
Low
High
< 103000
< 75
Planning Applications
by number of units
< 100
< 125
< 150
Local Authorities
Green Belts
GVA 2009 – 2018
GVA 2019 – 2028
Residential Planning Application Density
Planning Applications By Units
To see the full detail of our interactive map, including the key, please view this page on a desktop
+ Summary & conclusions
+ Section 4: Maximising existing corridors
+ Section 3: Where could growth be delivered?
+ Section 2:
Priorities for the Arc
+ Section 1:
Concept
& progress
+ Introduction