Native, hybrid or cross-platform: How to choose the right application development approach

Your company has an idea for a new mobile app. Now you need to choose how to develop it. But which mobile development approach is best for your app?

The right approach for your company can be difficult to navigate. Kforce Consulting Solutions can help you with impactful results and insights.

1. Native development

Dedicated to a single platform Native mobile applications are developed to target a single operating system: Android or iOS. This approach uses platform-specific languages and tools to develop the application. Android applications are developed using Kotlin or Java programming languages in Android Studio or IntelliJ IDEA IDEs (Integrated Development Envrionment). For iOS apps, developers use Swift or Objective-C programming languages along with Xcode to develop native iOS applications. Popular examples of native mobile apps include WhatsApp, TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, Nike and Amazon. 

Custom solutions to achieve your goals

From strategy to implementation, we provide the knowledge and leadership our clients rely on to accelerate their business. Whether you’re interested in native, cross-platform or PWA development, Kforce Consulting Solutions can help you through the process.

Published April 2025

Together Toward Tomorrow

Discover the power of partnership

Companies have three main options

Success story: Kforce develops center of excellence for sustainable transformation

Success story:Kforce develops API modernization tactical roadmap

GitHub Copilot: Software delivery teams’ best friend or worst enemy?

BENEFITS

Performance and speed Because native apps are created and optimized for a specific platform, they are smaller with direct contact between their source code and underlying resources. This allows the app to download faster and perform better. By using platform-specific APIs and programming languages, they also respond more efficiently to users’ actions. Excellent user experience Following the operating system’s design guides and using the device’s interfaces, these apps offer intuitive and customizable user experiences. Easier access to device-specific features and functionalities, such as the advanced camera functions, GPS and sensors, and services such as push notifications further drive user engagement. Offline functionality Available to users both on and offline, making them more reliable and usable in low to unstable network locations. Robust security Access to platform-specific built-in security features, such as intelligent fraud detection and file encryption. 

CHALLENGES

Higher development costs Native applications can be costly to develop if you plan to launch the app for both Android and iOS because you will need developer teams for each platform.  Longer development time Developing separate apps for each platform is more time-consuming. The same impact also applies to ongoing support and maintenance of the app.  Separate codebases for each platform Each operating system requires developers to write unique code for each platform. 

PRIMARY TAKEAWAY

Native development offers excellent performance and user experiences but requires separate development for each platform. A native approach is required for highly complex mobile apps. "Choose native app development when you require a feature-rich, graphic-intensive, mobile-first app that uses hardware features like the camera, GPS and sensors.," Vitrano said. "This approach is ideal for highly interactive apps that require full accessibility to deep system integration (e.g., Face ID and Arkit/CoreML) or full offline support."

CHALLENGES

Potential performance issues The rendering process and additional abstraction layer these apps require reduces their speed and lowers performance. Additionally, cross-platform frameworks bundle custom runtimes to run the app and communicate with platform-specific services. This adds another computation layer that further hinders performance and user experience. Complex integrations These frameworks do not offer platform-specific features. The apps must adapt their functionality and design for different devices, platforms and operating systems. This can make it more difficult for developers to integrate the apps into local settings and handle differences during feature implementation. Delayed platform features Any time Google or Apple releases a new update or feature for their operating system, these apps require a separate update to access and support the latest features. 

PRIMARY TAKEAWAY

Cross-platform development prioritizes cost and time savings with faster time-to-market but may lag in performance and user experience. This is a good choice for simple apps. "Cross-platform development has become a popular strategy for those who want to leverage both web and mobile platforms while providing app-like, highly reliable and seamless user experiences using a single code," Vitrano said.

BENEFITS

3. Cross-platform development

Single codebase for multiple platformsCross-platform applications are developed using a reusable web-based code to target multiple platforms, including iOS, Android and Windows. Companies can use this approach to create apps for multiple operating systems through one project. Cross-platform frameworks, such as React Native, Flutter and .NET MAUI (formerly Xamarin), allow developers to create apps using “write once, run anywhere” code. Popular examples of cross-platform mobile apps include Facebook, Google Pay, Skype and Walmart.

Single codebase for multiple platforms Developers can store the app’s codebase in one place and simultaneously work on multiple platforms. Rapid development and deployment The ability to reuse code improves the development team’s productivity. Additionally, cross-platform frameworks offer an optimized testing process, allowing companies to launch apps faster. Easier maintenance Code reusability also makes it easier and faster for developers to fix bugs and make updates to the app.  Lower development costs Cross-platform apps require only one development team knowledgeable in the chosen framework to create the app.

CHALLENGES

App vulnerabilities Running on web-based technologies makes these apps more vulnerable to security threats such as cross-site scripting and other web-based vulnerabilities. Ensuring robust security measures are in place is crucial to protect user data and maintain trust. Potential performance issues Combining native and non-native development components makes the code more complex, which can reduce performance. Optimizing the performance of these apps can be challenging and may require additional effort. Inconsistency in platforms Differences in platform-specific features, design guidelines and performance capabilities lead to inconsistent user experiences across platforms. Imitation of a true mobile app Progressive web apps provide an app-like experience but are not a true mobile application due to the lack of access to device hardware and deep system integration. They are not available on app stores and thus may not be taken seriously for enterprise solutions with long-term viability. Dependency on third-party frameworks Hybrid apps rely on frameworks like React, Native, Flutter, Ionic or Cordova, meaning developers depend on their updates and support. If a framework is discontinued or lacks certain features, developers must find workarounds (e.g. PhoneGap).

PRIMARY TAKEAWAY

Hybrid development combines web technologies with native elements for a wider reach but reduces performance and increases inconsistencies across platforms. This is a good choice for simple apps and for rapidly launching a minimum-viable product for a pilot project. “Choose progressive web app development if your business wants to target mobile-first users on a web platform with superior native-like app experience at a significantly lower cost," Vitrano said. "These generally include content heavy apps that need to be updated often or apps that require basic integration in which limited offline/hardware capabilities are sufficient."

BENEFITS

2. Hybrid/Progressive Web App (PWA) development

Web technologies wrapped in a native containerHybrid mobile applications are developed using web technologies such as HTML, CSS and JavaScript to code apps that are then wrapped in a native shell with an embedded web browser. This approach allows developers to utilize one codebase, enabling them to quickly create apps for multiple platforms (iOS, Android and mobile web). Popular examples of hybrid apps include web versions of Gmail, Uber and Airbnb. 

Rapid development and deployment Developers can share a single codebase for multiple platforms, reducing the time and effort required to build and launch the app.  Easier maintenance The ability to simultaneously test and update apps across multiple platforms makes on-going maintenance of the app easier and faster. This also helps ensure consistency and reduces the risk of platform-specific issues.  Lower development costs Hybrid apps require only one development team to create and maintain the app, reducing the overall cost of development compared to native apps. The use of web technologies lowers the barrier to entry for developers and reduces costs.  

How to choose the right app development approach

Here are a few key factors to consider when determining which development method is right for your app:

Strategic fit Time to market Development cost Operational cost Scalability User Experience (UI/ux) Security & compliance Performance Integration with native features

Hybrid apps (Webview-based)

Best for fast MVPs, internal tools or content apps. Fastest Rapid development & deployment. Lowest One team; shared codebase. Lower Easier maintenance; faster updates. Limited Struggle with high loads or complex interactions. Basic Web-based feel, lacks true native responsiveness. Riskier WebView-based; prone to vulnerabilities. Slower Not ideal for high-performance needs. Limited Requires plugins to access native APIs.

cross-platform apps (native compiled)

Ideal for startups, SMBs and cost-conscious enterprises. Moderate Faster than native, but requires fine-tuning. Moderate Single codebase but may require native tweaks. Moderate Less complex than native, but still needs expertise. Good Scalable for most; some performance trade-offs. Good Close to native, but may require customizations. Good Secure, but not as robust as native. Better Optimized, but lags native in complex scenarios. Moderate Most features available, but may be delayed.

native apps (platform-specific)

Necessary for scalable, high-performance consumer-facing apps. Slowest Separate builds for iOS & Android increase time. Highest Requires separate teams for iOS & Android. Highest Each platform requires ongoing separate support. Best High traffic, global scaling and intensive processing. Premium Best performance, animations and UX. Best Full control over security, compliance & encryption. Best Speed, responsiveness and resource efficiency. Full access Direct integration with all platform-specific features.

Factor

—Bobby Vitrano, VP Consulting Solutions Application Engineering

SPACE IN BETWEEN BUTTONS

SPACE IN BETWEEN MODULES/ Macros/ Sections

SPACE IN BETWEEN HEADER AND SUBHEAD + Subhead & Body

How to Optimize Your Professional Brand on LinkedIn

Stay Updated on Industry Trends with Twitter

How to Use Instagram During Your Job Search

Statista App Worldwide Market Forecast