Video Player is loading.
Loaded: 0%
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x

KPMG GenAI Study:

The Path to Sustainable Returns

GenAI strategies have hit a new inflection point. As we reach the midpoint of 2024, C-suite and business leaders are no longer just investing in the technology, they are aggressively scaling GenAI to unlock new revenue streams, maximize ROI and cement their competitive advantage.

See below to learn more.

"Leaders are beginning to view GenAI investment and adoption as table stakes. 

Now, they’re focused on how to translate those investments into a competitive advantage. Organizations are making a massive push for AI talent and adjusting their business strategies to capitalize on GenAI’s transformative potential."

80%

— Steve Chase, Vice Chair of AI and Digital Innovation, KPMG U.S.

80%

C-suite and business leaders across the U.S.

First chart – change the pie chart graphic. This is our most important stat, so it needs to visually pop.

The majority (80%) of C-suite and business leaders across the U.S. now recognize GenAI as important to maintaining a competitive advantage and gaining market share.

C-suite and business leaders across the U.S.

Q2

Q1

50%

49%

Enhancing products and services by analyzing customer data

Improve supply chain efficiency and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability and revenue

48%

48%

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

46%

42%

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

38%

Improving supply chain efficiency and reducing cost

Enhance existing products and services by analyzing customer data and identifying unmet needs and preferences

37%

20%

Q1

Q2

49%

50%

Enhancing products and services by analyzing customer data

Improve supply chain efficiency and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability and revenue

48%

48%

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

42%

46%

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

37%

38%

Improving supply chain efficiency and reducing cost

Enhance existing products and services by analyzing customer data and identifying unmet needs and preferences

When it comes to expectations regarding GenAI investments, leaders have different goals - but AI investment remains a priority for 97% of those surveyed in the first quarter of the year.

49%

50%

48%

48%

42%

46%

37%

38%

$50 - 100M

Healthcare

$100 - 249M

23%

22%

15%

$250 - 499M

How much in USD do executives plan to invest in GenAI over the next 12 months?

49%

50%

Opportunities to create value have shifted, with improving product quality, efficiency and innovation at the top of the priority list.

48%

48%

Q1

Q2

Enhancing existing products and services by analyzing customer data and identifying unmet needs and preferences

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

50%

48%

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

48%

47%

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

Improving supply chain efficiency and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability and revenue

42%

47%

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

Enhancing existing products and services by analyzing customer data and identifying unmet needs and preferences

Improving supply chain efficiency and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability and revenue

37%

38%

Third graphic: Change all the verb tenses to “enhancing,” improving etc.
Also, I find this graphic hard to read – what about a line graphic?

42%

46%

46%

50%

48%

48%

42%

49%

50%

enhancing products and services 
by analyzing customer data

48%

enhancing efficiency to 
generate greater productivity

42%

improving product quality, 
efficiency and innovation

37%

improving supply chain 
efficiency and reducing cost

38%

37%

38%

37%

52%

51%

Productivity

Revenue generated

44%

48%

Employee satisfaction

Improved decision making 

38%

47%

Revenue generated 

Improved productivity 

Q1

Q2

Enhancing products and services by analyzing customer data

Improve supply chain efficiency and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability and revenue

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

Improving supply chain efficiency and reducing cost

Enhance existing products and services by analyzing customer data and identifying unmet needs and preferences

Q1

Q2

ROI metrics are rapidly evolving with the majority of business leaders prioritizing revenue over productivity gains, a drastic shift from last quarter.

Q1

Q2

50%

49%

Enhancing products and services by analyzing customer data

Improve supply chain efficiency and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability and revenue

48%

48%

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

46%

42%

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

38%

Improving supply chain efficiency and reducing cost

Enhance existing products and services by analyzing customer data and identifying unmet needs and preferences

37%

52%

51%

4th graphic: I also find this chart hard to read – could we do something else? 

50%

enhancing products and services 
by analyzing customer data

48%

enhancing efficiency to 
generate greater productivity

42%

improving product quality, 
efficiency and innovation

37%

improving supply chain 
efficiency and reducing cost

48%

47%

44%

40%

Q1

Q2

Productivity

Employee satisfaction

Revenue generated

Revenue generated

Improved decision making

Improved productivity

[New graphic (2) comparing Q1 and Q2 top stats: ]

Q1

Q2

52%

51%

Productivity

Revenue generated

48%

44%

Employee satisfaction

Improved decision making 

47%

38%

Revenue generated 

Improved productivity 

5th graphic: The bar chart doesn’t reflect the data findings.
Can we bold this clause? “training and capability building initiatives jumping from 35% to 59%”

The emphasis on hiring tech professionals has more than doubled from 26% to 60% quarter-over-quarter.

Simultaneously, organizations are heavily investing in upskilling their existing workforce, with training and capability building initiatives jumping from 35% to 59%.

60%

59%

35%

26%

Q1

Q2

Hiring

Upskilling

The emphasis on hiring tech professionals has more than doubled from 26% to 60% quarter-over-quarter. Simultaneously, organizations are heavily investing in upskilling their existing workforce, with training and capability building initiatives jumping from 35% to 59%. 

Q1

Q2

50%

49%

Enhancing products and services by analyzing customer data

Improve supply chain efficiency and reduce costs, leading to increased profitability and revenue

48%

48%

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

Enhancing efficiency to generate greater productivity

46%

42%

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

Improving product quality, efficiency and innovation

38%

37%

Improving supply chain efficiency and reducing cost

Enhance existing products and services by analyzing customer data and identifying unmet needs and preferences

When choosing GenAI providers, leaders prioritize technology and expertise (67%), scalability and performance (65%) and use case compatibility (54%).

67%

65%

54%

Technology and expertise

Scalability and performance

Use case compatibility

6th graphic: The title is off-center. Also, feel like the graphic is a lot of blue and the text is really small. It takes up a lot of space. I would only bold the following instead:
“technology and expertise” “scalability and performance” “use case compatibility”

The majority (51%) of executives are measuring return on investment (ROI) of AI through productivity gains.

With GenAI, the top ways executives are currently measuring ROI include:

Nearly half of respondents are measuring ROI through employee satisfaction (48%) and amount of revenue generated (47%).

73%

Boards are increasingly seeking GenAI experience with 73% of leaders planning to recruit new board members to guide GenAI strategy and oversight.

Leaders overwhelmingly picked Technology, Media and Telecommunication (TMT) as the sector leading in GenAI adoption

91%

47%

25%

Technology, Media & Telecommunication

Financial Services

Healthcare

8th graphic – needs a header which should be what is currently under the 91%: Leaders overwhelmingly picked TMT as the sector leading in GenAI adoption
Then under the 91% add “TMT”
Capitalize “Services” in Financial Services

91%

47%

25%

Leaders overwhelmingly picked TMT as the sector leading in GenAI adoption (91%), followed by financial services (47%), and healthcare (25%). 

AI Thought Leadership:

2024 KPMG Generative AI 
Consumer Trust Survey

KPMG 2023 Consumer 
Technology Survey

KPMG Trusted AI and the 
Regulatory Landscape

2023 US Customer Experience Excellence Report

KPMG GenAI Study: the path to sustainable returns

The 2024 KPMG U.S. CEO Outlook Pulse Survey

Navigating The AI Era In 

Financial Reporting

KPMG Launches "AI Impact Initiative” to Bring AI to Non-Profits

KPMG Alliances:

KPMG Named Informatica's 2023 
Global Innovation Partner of the Year

KPMG US and IBM Expand 
Alliance in Energy & Utilities

KPMG and Rhino.ai 
Announce Strategic Alliance

KPMG Commits to Building a Future of Artificial Intelligence with Salesforce

KPMG Upgrades GenAI 

Audit Assistant

KPMG Announces Google Cloud Center of Excellence

KPMG Launches "AI Impact Initiative” to Bring AI Technology to Non-Profits

KPMG LLP launches KPMG 
Digital Finance

KPMG Collaborates with Databricks to Drive Responsible AI

BACK TO TOP

kpmg.com

Some or all of the services described herein may not be permissible for KPMG audit clients and their affiliates and related entities. 

The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the interviewees and survey respondents and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of KPMG LLP.  

© 2024 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization.

Powered by Ceros