December 2024
Key risks The value of an investment and any income taken from it is not guaranteed and can go down as well as up, and the investor may get back less than the original amount invested. Important information The views expressed in this document are those of Legal & General Investment Management Limited and/or its affiliates (‘Legal & General’, ‘we’ or ‘us’) as at the date of publication. This document is for information purposes only and we are not soliciting any action based on it. The information above discusses general economic, market or political issues and/or industry or sector trends. It does not constitute research or investment, legal or tax advice. It is not an offer or recommendation or advertisement to buy or sell securities or pursue a particular investment strategy. No party shall have any right of action against Legal & General in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document. The information is believed to be correct as at the date of publication, but no assurance can be given that this document is complete or accurate in the light of information that may become available after its publication. We are under no obligation to update or amend the information in this document. Where this document contains third party information, the accuracy and completeness of such information cannot be guaranteed and we accept no responsibility or liability in respect of such information. This document may not be reproduced in whole or in part or distributed to third parties without our prior written permission. Not for distribution to any person resident in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. © 2024 Legal & General Investment Management Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, No. 119272. Registered in England and Wales No. 02091894 with registered office at One Coleman Street, London, EC2R 5AA.
scroll down
Download
Top
Buyout, run-on or both?
Market conditions
PRT market in focus
Run-on and surplus
Future for DB pensions
Endgame
Insights
please supply links for 3 endgame options
Endgame Insights
For professional investors only. Capital at risk.
Buyout Schemes wishing to ‘lock in’ their strong funding positions by progressing towards buyout with an insurer to ensure full security of their pension scheme and its members. The goal here is to guarantee the security of members' pensions, irrespective of market volatility, and remove future scheme running expenses. Click here to learn more.
Run-on Some trustees may want to ‘run on’ their scheme in perpetuity i.e. remain invested and focussed on paying pensions until the final member benefit is paid. These schemes may be seeking to extract a surplus that could be returned to the sponsoring company and potentially used to offer additional discretionary benefits to DB members, or to fund the company’s defined contribution (DC) pension scheme. Click here to learn more.
Both A significant group of well-funded schemes are keen to stay invested now (and potentially target a surplus), while keeping the ultimate security of buyout in mind over a longer-term horizon. These schemes are seeking to have the ‘best of both’ endgame destinations. Click here to learn more.
Endgame options
Offering you the combined expertise of a UK market leader Legal & General is both UK’s largest manager of DB pensions1 and a leading provider of Pension Risk Transfer (PRT).
For more detail on investment strategies and endgame options please read our article below.
You choose the endgame, we'll build the bridge
Source IPE Research 2023.
We’ll help you build a bridge to your endgame
Click here to read the current market conditions report.
“Not only have funding levels risen, but the wider pensions landscape is changing too.”
please choose 1 link for each of these paragraphs. Either the relevant pages buyoout, run-on, both or the prt in focus page. links on the sub-titles won't work as they are in bold already for being a subtitle.
Offering you the combined expertise of a UK market leader.
Over the coming decade, trustees representing millions of UK pension scheme members will implement plans to manage their defined benefit (DB) pension schemes for their chosen endgame. Not only have funding levels risen, but the wider pensions landscape is changing too. These changes have resulted both in soaring demand for pension buyouts, and increasing interest in investment strategies that help trustees to continue running on their schemes either indefinitely or for a period prior to securing their members’ benefits with an insurer. In industry parlance, these scenarios are referred to as pension scheme endgames. As the UK’s largest manager of DB pension assets and the largest and longest serving provider of Pension Risk Transfer (PRT) solutions (buy-ins and buyouts), L&G is well positioned to support trustees and sponsoring companies with their endgame journey. In our inaugural Endgame Insights report we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the latest market conditions and evolving solutions-focus from both an investment and insurance perspective. What an optimal ‘endgame’ looks like varies from scheme to scheme. Buyout remains attractive for schemes seeking enhanced security, while the government’s 2024 consultation on surplus extraction looks set to increase choice and flexibility even further. In short, we see three main endgame options for schemes listed below.
Rising funding levels DB schemes have been on a long-term journey towards full funding, with sponsoring companies contributing hundreds of billions of pounds to repair pension scheme deficits across the past two decades. As at 31 March 2024, the PPF estimates that total DB assets were c.£1.2 trillion and over a third of schemes (by value) were in surplus on a buyout basis. The chart below shows the evolution of the total value of DB assets compared to the total cost of UK DB schemes entering the Pension Protection Fund (Total PPF Liabilities) and the total cost of all UK DB schemes insuring liabilities. Having spent many years seeking to improve funding levels, the surge in bond yields since 2022 has accelerated this progress as liability values have fallen more than asset values. This has meant that many schemes find themselves better funded than ever before, as indicated by the yellow dots on the chart showing increasing funding levels on a buyout basis. Consequently, the average DB scheme now holds assets that could already be sufficient to meet their long-term liabilities of paying all members’ pensions in full as they fall due.
Distribution of buyout funding levels According to the Purple Book 2024, just over a third of DB pension scheme assets are above 100% funding on a buyout basis, as shown in the chart below, corresponding to c.£413bn of assets. This brings to life the potential immediate demand for PRT from UK DB schemes.
The distribution of buyout funding levels is not even, with larger schemes tending to have higher funding levels on average than smaller schemes
Over the past six months, this overall dynamic has remained largely unchanged
“
”
Dave Corbett
Director of Marketing PRT UK
Source: The Purple Book 2024, PPF7800 Index as at 30 November 2024, including restated data from 31 March 2023 to reflect revised calculation methodology.
Source: The Purple Book 2024, L&G analysis, as at 31 March 2024.
Why might a scheme choose buyout?
Some copy here about monitor. Some copy here about monitor. Some copy here about monitor.
15 words (approx.)
John Towner
Managing Director Pension Risk Transfer - UK PRT
UK PRT market volumes In the first half of 2024, insurers completed £15.2bn of buy-ins and buyouts. We expect the total market volume at the end of the year to exceed £40bn, which would be one of the largest years on record. As the chart shows, we expect appetite for buy-ins and buyouts to remain elevated into 2025 and across the next decade. Healthy DB funding levels are expected to persist resulting in a paradigm shift to an average c.£45bn per annum UK PRT market. The structure and timing of large transactions (particularly those of £5bn+) can materially impact the total market volume in any given year, as indicated by the forecast ranges (below).
175 words (approx.)
Trustees settle their obligations and fulfil their fiduciary duties to their members.
A buyout removes the risks of investment, longevity, interest rate changes, inflation and future running expenses for the scheme.
Companies draw a line under their historical obligations, knowing they have secured them for the long term. This enables them to focus on their core businesses and the future.
In the September edition of our PRT Monitor, we offered a side-by-side analysis of the two largest PRT markets globally – the US and UK. Based on current levels, more than £250 billion of combined UK and US volumes are likely to be secured by insurers in the next three years alone.
Endgame strategy
Research issued by Legal & General in partnership with the Centre of Economics and Business Research in March reveals insights into the de-risking journeys of some of the UK’s largest pension schemes, with over half of respondents planning to use insurance as part of their endgame objectives.
Preparing portfolios
46% of respondents said their time horizon is shorter than a year ago by an average of over two and a half years. All the schemes that cited buyout as their long-term objective are aiming to complete a transaction within the next 3 years.
Changing time horizons
Recent analysis
For the latest commentary from our industry experts, watch or listen to our dedicated de-risking series, The PRT Pod.
The buy-in and buyout market at a glance
Download our latest UK PRT market update and client service reports.
Members receive enhanced security; their pensions move from the pensions regime to the safety of the more prudently regulated insurance environment.
Growth in UK PRT is further reflected by the increasing number of transactions over time Over the past two years, there has been a significant increase in the number of £1 bn+ buy-ins and buyouts.
In a record-breaking 2023, insurers completed 12 transactions of over £1bn. In 2024, we expect insurers to have completed a further 12 transactions of this size. The number of transactions completed each year is steadily increasing, primarily driven by schemes smaller than £100m, which make up the vast majority of transactions. 226 transactions were completed market-wide in 2023. In H1 2024, insurers secured 134 transactions, with the market on track to surpass 250 transactions across 2024. Prepare don’t predict The geopolitical landscape continues to be uncertain and trustees who are both nimble and well-prepared can attract insurer attention in a busy market and take advantage of fast-moving changes in market conditions. Key to this is understanding market dynamics and being able to react to opportunities. Trustees that understand their scheme funding level and how insurers price are better equipped to take advantage of short-lived opportunities that can arise as a result of unpredictable market movements. Legal & General can help schemes to align their investment strategy with insurer pricing and put in place trigger-based buyout hedging. To help schemes prepare their market approach, we offer a simple step-by-step checklist.
Partnering with an insurer We’re seeing more large schemes adopt a partnership model in their approach to the market, where they work collaboratively with a single insurer in an open and transparent way to achieve their buyout goal. Partnering with an insurer allows us to work through any complexities and offer a solutions-focussed approach across all elements of the transaction. More broadly, the insurer and scheme benefit from the ability to work dynamically to improve a scheme’s funding level, provide the scheme with priority access to the insurer’s best resources and to take advantage of pricing opportunities when they arise. This can lead to more pricing certainty for the trustees and greater execution certainty for the insurer. Legal & General’s recent £1.1bn buy-in with the SCA UK Pension Plan is an example of this approach in action. Solving the illiquid assets conundrum Given the current higher interest rate environment, many schemes are now finding that they have reached full buyout funding earlier than expected but still have significant illiquid asset holdings. This can be problematic for PRT transactions if the assets aren’t straightforward to sell or transfer to an insurer. In a recent survey of some of the UK’s largest DB schemes run by Legal & General in partnership with Cebr, one statistic that jumps off the page is that 75% of the schemes surveyed said they were decreasing their allocations to illiquid assets. We have seen significant innovation in both investment strategies and insurance solutions to support schemes in this position – from insurers accepting illiquid assets in-specie as part of the premium payment to allowing schemes to defer part of the premium to coincide with the redemption or run-off timeframe. Click here to learn more about illiquid asset solutions.
Opportunities for small schemes The market for smaller schemes continues to flourish with the number of transactions below £100m more than doubling from 2020 to 2023. A recent survey from DLA Piper found that all consultants operating in the small scheme space have seen successful transaction rates alongside affordable pricing. At L&G we offer a dedicated solution for smaller schemes called Flow which offers: · Immediately transactable pricing · Tailored price locks and flexible premium payment options · Dedicated and personal post-transaction support Click here to find out more about Flow. Increased affordability means increased focus from pension schemes on non-price factors Delivering members’ pensions on time, every time is the central purpose of the transaction. Trustees want to ensure that the post-sale process is reliable and well-managed, and that their members will receive an excellent level of service and care for the long term. Our award-winning in-house administration function holds a world class net promoter score of +70 and we have a five-year resource plan in place to support growing volumes. We have recently opened a new office in Glasgow, having welcomed an additional 17 colleagues from the British Steel Pension Scheme administration team to L&G in October. Find out more our customer service ethos.
A selection of L&G transactions across the last 18 months
May 2023 £2.7bn buy-in with British Steel – completion of £7.5bn de-risking journey
November 2023 £4.8bn full scheme buy-in with Boots
May 2024 Third and final Nortel buyout bringing total insured with L&G to £2.5bn
May 2024 £900m buy-in with ICI, >£7bn secured in aggregate
July 2024 £21m buy-in with The Leprosy Mission Central Pension Scheme
August 2024 £1.1bn buy-in with the SCA UK Pension Plan
October 2024 £1.1bn buy-in with the Deutsche Bank Pension Scheme
November 2024
May 2024
July 2024
May 2023
in focus
Read about The buy-in and buyout market here
Source: LCP, baseline indications are L&G estimates
Source: LCP
November 2023
August 2024
Scheme administration moves to a customer services platform building for a long-term future.
October 2024
November 2024 £34m buy-in with Walkers Shortbread Limited Retirement Benefits Scheme
PRT market in focus In this section we explore the key themes and dynamics that we’re seeing in the PRT market.
Key trends to watch
Some copy here about expectations. Some copy here about expectations. Some copy here about expectations.
Tracking DB scheme surplus over time on a low dependency basis Amid the rise in aggregate funding levels in recent years, many scheme are now not only fully funded, but in surplus. The chart below highlights the extent to which PPF data currently implies that DB schemes in aggregate are in surplus on a low-dependency basis of ‘gilts+50bps’.
Approx 150 words intro
Portfolio
Solutions
Official
Considered
Official Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more.
Considered Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more.
The DB Blog
Portfolio Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more.
Solutions Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more information here. Some more.
Select a trend to learn more
Seeking to maintain and even grow this surplus has many potential attractions for schemes given the recent regulatory change surrounding surplus extraction, whether that is to generate enhanced benefits for members, to be paid to the sponsor, or to be utilised within funding of a defined contribution (DC) or other DB pension scheme. Investing for run-on and the potential to generate surplus As trustees review their investment strategies with the objective of running on to pay pensions and grow a surplus, they will need to consider whether to return value to the sponsor, provide an uplift in benefits for members or to top-up a related DB or DC scheme (or a combination thereof). It is therefore vital for them to take into account the assets, the liabilities and the sponsor covenant. Whilst an important feature of portfolio construction is that it is should be holistic, it can be useful to think in a segmented or ‘pot-based’ approach to construct: · A matching portfolio with the primary objective of meeting accrued benefits, a key feature of which will be to consider a cashflow-matching approach, integrated with LDI strategy, to pay cashflows, hedge liability risks and generate a surplus over time. · A surplus portfolio being the remaining assets in excess of the value of the liabilities, invested partly as a ‘rainy day portfolio’ to be used as a first point of call for any deficit in the matching portfolio, but also to generate short-term or long-term growth commensurate with a surplus extraction plan with the intention of extracting a surplus that could be returned to the sponsoring company and potentially used to offer additional discretionary benefits to DB members, or to fund the company’s DC pension scheme.
Where schemes have a high allocation to cashflow-matching credit within the matching portfolio, it can make sense to deploy a ‘dynamic discount rate’ when calculating the value of the liabilities, where the discount rate is based on the yield of the cashflow-matching assets, so reducing volatility in the funding level. For more detail on strategies for maintaining scheme health and unlocking surplus, please read our whitepaper: Running on into retirement? Alternatively, please view our video summary or roundtable discussion. Is it cost effective to implement a cashflow matching approach in the current market conditions? For schemes that are seeking to implement a cashflow matching approach within their run-on strategy, it can be important to consider the implementation plan in light of credit spread movements – when credit spreads are higher, the cost of implementation is cheaper and vice versa, as shown in the below chart:
Credit spreads have continued to fall over the past six months as investors have become more sanguine about both the domestic and global economic outlooks. Inflation has fallen notably from high levels and central banks have now begun to ease policy rates in response. This has left credit spreads near the bottom of their long-term ranges and makes cashflow matching implementation expensive compared to longer term averages. To discover more about the outlook we see for credit spreads, please see recent LDI chart update: Where next for credit spreads? For those schemes wondering how best to invest for their endgame amid today’s environment of low spreads, please see our blogs: Investing for the endgame at low spreads and Time to increase your allocation to credit?
Source: PwC Low Reliance Index as at October 2023
Source: LGIM, Bloomberg L.P as at 31 October 2024, GBP Corporates Index (UR00), percentiles from 31 December 1996 to 31 October 2024. Past performance is not a guide to the future.
chart in progress
Buyout Schemes wishing to ‘lock in’ their strong funding positions by progressing towards buyout to ensure full security of their pension scheme and its members. The goal here to guarantee members pensions, irrespective of market volatility. Click here to learn more.
Endgame Options
Run-on Many trustees want to ‘run on’ their scheme in perpetuity i.e. remain invested and focussed on paying pensions until the final member benefit is paid. These schemes may be seeking greater value for members from a potential surplus. Click here to learn more.
Both A significant group of well-funded schemes are keen to stay invested now (and potentially target a surplus), while keeping buyout in mind over on a longer-term horizon. These schemes are seeking to have the ‘best of both’ endgame destinations. Click here to learn more.
We’ll help you construct the way forward
Buyout or run-on As mentioned earlier in the report, UK DB pension schemes are in the healthiest, best funding position they have been for decades. Considering these improvements, much debate has centred around whether schemes should choose to buy out or run on. From speaking to pension schemes, our view is that most schemes will incorporate insurance into their long-term de-risking strategy and for many, moving to buyout will be a question of optimal timing. Objectives will depend on individual circumstances. A proportion of schemes will opt to run on in perpetuity while some may want to take more time to achieve different objectives, for example, to generate a surplus, or to restructure illiquid assets and prepare for buyout. It doesn’t need to be an all or nothing decision and the option remains open to run-on for a period, before buying out at a time of the trustees’ choosing. Discover more Debating buyout vs. run-on: an insurer's perspective, John Towner, Managing Director of UK PRT Video: Bridging the gap to your endgame, Lisa Purdy, Head of DB Solutions Distribution
What could be in store for funding levels? With monetary easing cycles under way in developed economies and bonds once again providing potential insurance against equity risk, we believe that interest rate hedging could be key for DB schemes looking to maintain elevated funding levels. As we look towards year-end, with lots of lower-inflation data in the bank, we think it's hard for investors to get concerned about high inflation. We therefore believe there's plenty of scope for bonds yields to fall relative to equity yields. To discover more about the outlook we see for credit spreads, please see our recent article: Preserving funding levels as rates fall Whatever your scheme’s preferred endgame, please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or would like to hear more about how Legal & General can help you build the bridge to your chosen destination.
Managing Director Pension Risk Transfer – UK PRT
Mark Johnson
Head of UK – Institutional and Wholesale Clients, Asset Management
With monetary easing cycles under way in developed economies and bonds once again providing potential insurance against equity risk, we believe that interest rate hedging could be key for DB schemes looking to maintain elevated funding levels.
